I am currently working on some simple custom allocators in c++ which generally works allready. I also overloaded the new/delete operators to allocate memory from my own allocator. Anyways I came acros
In short, my question is: If you have class, MyClass<T>, how can you change the class definition to support cases where you have MyClass<T, Alloc>, similar to how, say, STL vector provides
Apparently there is a “malloc_allocator” provided with gcc f开发者_StackOverflowor use with STL. It simply wraps malloc and free. There is also a hook for an out-of-memory handler. Where can I find
I\'m writing a C++ custom allocator for use with STL. When I put 开发者_如何学Gothe following code in the class definition, it compiles:
I\'d like to make use of Electric Fence in an MFC application. I\'d like to track new/ delete, and if I can track malloc/ free that\'s an added bonus.
Freelists are a common way to speed up allocation by reusing existing memory that was already allocated.Is there a way to use free-lists in a concurrent allocator, without incurring the overhead of a
Are there STL implementations that use operator new[] as an allocator? On my compiler, making Foo:开发者_JS百科:operator new[] private did not prevent me from creating a vector<Foo>... is that b
We\'re using STLPORT and we\'d like to change stlport\'s default allocator: instead of vector<int&开发者_开发知识库gt;, we\'d like to try vector<int, otherallocator>
I\'m using a custom allocator to account for memory usage in several containers. Currently I use a static variable to account for the memory usage. How could I separate this account across several con
Recently I\'ve noticed that the following statement is not true given std::string s. s.max_size() == s.get_allocator().max_size();
加载中,请稍侯......