Is there a benefit to aligning data to a certain size on storage?For example, if I have the option to use one byte to store information or 4 bytes, which is preferred (assuming that storage size doesn
In the latest draft of the c++11 standard, chapter 3.11 talks about the alignment. Later, the chapter 7.6.1 defines how to define an aligned structures (or variables?)
To my knowledge, a CPU performs best with a datum that is aligned on the boundary equal to the size of that datum. For example, if every int datum is 4 bytes in size, then the address of every int mus
I\'m looking for a good (comprehensive) doc about memory alignment in C++, typical approaches, differences between compilers, and common pitfalls. Just to check if my understanding of the topic is cor
To prevent false sharing, I want to align each element of an array to a cache line. So first I need to know the size of a cache line, so I assign each element that amount of bytes. Secondly I want the
I always assume, as they said here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_structure_alignment, \"It is important to note that the last member is padded with the number of bytes required so that the total s
I have a class which takes an SQL query, executes it, then binds every column in the resultset as SQL_C_WCHAR using row-wise binding.
I have an开发者_运维技巧 array which is used as the underlying memory of an object of type T: char memory[sizeof T];
I have a class that looks roughly like this: template<std::size_t dim> class Foo { public: Foo(void const * const data);
Why does the following work and not throw some kind of segmentation fault? char *path = \"/usr/bin/\";