I understand why data n开发者_StackOverfloweed to be aligned (and all the efforts made to accomplish it like padding) so we can reduce the number of memory accesses but this assumes that processor jus
I found, the hard way, that at least boost::program_options is dependent of the compiler configured structure member alignment.
I\'m generating some opcodes dynamically in a JIT compiler and I\'m looking for guidelines for opcode alignment.
Will the memory block returned by VirtualAlloc always be 开发者_开发技巧aligned with the page size?In other words, will the modulus always be zero of the return value from VirtualAlloc and the page si
In order to use OSAtomicDecrement (mac-specific atomic operation), I need to provide a 4-byte aligned SInt32.
I am trying to byte-align a function to 16-byte boundary using the \'aligned(16)\' attribute. I did the following:void__attribute__((aligned(16)))function() {}
How do you allocate memory that\'s aligned to a specific boundary in C (e.g., cache line boundary)?I\'m looking for malloc/free like implementation that ideally would be as portable as possible --- at
EDIT: This is a followup to SSE2 Compiler Error This is the real bug I experienced before and have reproduced below by changing the _mm_malloc statement as Michael Burr suggested:
I开发者_如何转开发\'ve recently encountered what I think is a false-sharing problem in my application, and I\'ve looked up Sutter\'s article on how to align my data to cache lines. He suggests the fol
加载中,请稍侯......