When I specialize a (static) member function/constant in a template class, I\'m confused as to where the declaration is meant to go.
When I write class templates, and need to fully-specialize members of those classes, Doxygen doesn\'t recognize the specialization - it documents only the generic definition, or (if there are only spe
If you\'ve used CPPUnit before, you are probably aware of its assertion_traits class that is templatized to handle arbitrary types.This is what allows it to print the \"actual\" and \"expected\" value
I read C++ Primer, and it says function template specialization is an advanced topic, but I am to开发者_StackOverflowtally lost.Can anybody offer an example why function template specialization is imp
This is a followup to C++ templates: prevent instantiation of base template I use templates to achieve function overloading without the mess of implicit type conversions: declare the function templat
// First try this: template <class T> T Read(istream& in) { T t; in >> t; return t; } // If there is no operator>>(开发者_如何学编程istream&, T) try this:
Is there a way to create a new type that is like one of the basic types (eg char), and can be implcitly converted between, but will resolve diffrently in templates, such that for example, the followin
加载中,请稍侯......