I am investigating a problem with C++ class templates. One class template is specialized but the compiler does not always choose to use the specialization. I found that the constructor arguments seem
I have a templated class with an templated member function template<class T> class A { public: template<class CT>
By looking at the following code, I am confused by line 3. Line 3 is not a special case of the base template, it is more like a \"class overload\". But it can be compiled successfully.
I have a situation similar to this: template<class A, class B> class MyClass<A, B> { ... static A RARELY_USED_A;
I\'m playing around with template specialization, and I\'ve found an issue I can\'t seem to solve; this is my code:
template<typename T> struct A { A<T> operator%( const T& x); }; template<typename T>
OK I have: template<typename T> class Reader { class Input { template<typename C> void operator()(C& val) const
Suppose I am a user of a Certain Template Library (CTL) which defines a templat开发者_如何转开发e, named, say, Hector
I have a variadic template function which calls itself to determine the largest number in a list (constituted by the templatized arguments). I am trying to make a specialization for when the parameter
I\'m very surprised to find that the following compiles: #include <iostream> using namespace std;
加载中,请稍侯......