This question already has answers here: Why would you ever implement finalize(开发者_运维百科)?
When I read a few articles about memory management in C#, I was confused by Finalizer methods. There are so many complicated rules which related with them.
So here is the story so far, I have this worker thingy which uses an AppDomain to perform some task.The domain is expensive to setup and teardown.So I create a cache per-thread of WeakReference object
Based on the documentat开发者_Go百科ion (MSDN: link), it is clear that one should use the IDisposable pattern when implementing a finalizer.
I have a standalone .exe COM server and a trivial C# test program that launches an instance of the server and closes it immediately afterwards. Works like a charm. However, if I close the C# program i
Suppose I have a message pump class in C++0x like the following (note, SynchronizedQueue is a queue of function<void()> and when you call receive() on the queue and it is empty, it blocks the ca
I get an InvalidComObjectException after I close my application in the following piece of code: class MyExcelManager
Disclaimer: I know IDisposable should be implemented when dealing with unmanaged resources.The rest of the code should be deterministic and do using (...) { } (equivalent of try {} finally { Dispose()
Using Ado开发者_如何学Cbe Flex 3, is there any way to specify a finaliser?There is no concept of a finaliser/destructor in ActionScript 3, even at the AVM/bytecode level.Even though there isn\'t such
We\'re running a small JRuby on Rails app under Tomcat 6.0.28 with a Spring-based backend. I\'ve spent some time with the Eclipse Memory Analysis tool and I can definitely tell that instances of the J