Effective Java says : There is a severe performance penalty for using finalizers.开发者_C百科 Why is it slower to destroy an object using the finalizers?Because of the way the garbage collector w
Quote from MSDN: If Finalize or an override of Finalize throws an exce开发者_运维问答ption, the runtime ignores the exception, terminates that Finalize method, and continues the finalization process.
How can I handle all exceptions for a class similar to the following under certain circumstances? class Test : IDisposable {
I have few Question for which I am not able to get a proper answer . 1) Why should we call SuppressFinalize in the Dispose function when we don\'t have a destructor .
From Effective Java 2nd Edition Item 7: Avoid Finalizers \"Oh, and one more thing: there is a severe performance penalty for using finalizers. On my machine, the time to create and destroy a simple o
In other words, class Foo { object obj; Foo() { obj = new object(); } ~Foo() { obj.ToString(); /* Null开发者_运维百科ReferenceException? */ }
I\'m writing a Excel class using Microsoft.Interropt.Excel DLL. I finish all function but I have an error in my Destructor.
I\'m not quite understanding why there are finalizers in languages such as java and c#. AFAIK, they: are not guaranteed to run (in java)
Please Note: This question is about the difference in terminology between the words \"destructor\" and \"finalizer\" and their correct usage. I have merely provided examples of their use in C# and C++
I am using a search library which advises keeping search handle object open for this can benefit query cache. Over the time I have observed that the cache tends to get bloated (few hundred megs and ke
加载中,请稍侯......