I have an application that experiences a slow memory leak from the word go. Using ANTS Memory Profiler I can see that all of the leaked memory is being held by the finalizer queue\'s GC root.
I have a misbehaving application that seems to leak. After a brief profiler investigation, most memory (80%) is held by java.lang.ref.Finalizer instances. I suspect that finalizers fail to run.
Finalizers are not destructors, finalizers are useless. From what I hear a lot of Java resource Objects dispose on finalize() \"just in case\".
This is a fairly fine point, and I expect the answer is \"it\'s not a hot idea to begin with\" - that said, it has a points that I\'m interested in regardless, if someone is kind enough to indulge.
How does a \"finalizer guardian\" [Effective Java , page 30] work ? Have you used them? Did it solve any specific开发者_如何学Go problem ?It solves the problem of the sub-class forgetting to call th
The following screenshow is开发者_如何学运维 taken from IBM Heap Analyzer. I want to understand the difference between \'Number of Objects with Finalize() method\' and \'Number of garbage objects im
Finalizers are always called by .net framework, so the sequence could be out of control; and even if the constructor failed, the destructor 开发者_JAVA百科still can be triggered.
I have an object that has a BackgroundWorker thread (purely a queue of Action delegates). i.e., it\'s the common, simple single-producer single-consumer scenario.
As I understand, the destructor syntax (~ClassName) in C# is a way to write a finalizer. This method becomes Finalize method after compiling to the IL.
I have a finalizer that seems to always fail during application shutdown. I think this is because it\'s holding onto some native resources that are no longer valid at that point. Is there a way to tel
加载中,请稍侯......