In C++11, I\'m missing a syntatic sugar for uniquifying a pointer into std::unique_ptr. I therefore wrote the following litte helper function 开发者_开发技巧std::uniquify_ptr typically used to easy (n
So I have a std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Base>> vec and I\'m trying to sort it dynamically, given that there are logical comparisons between Derived1 to Derivedn (Derivedn always > Derivedn
Creating an object and giving ownership to a container using a unique_ptr is no problem. How would one remove an element by raw pointer?
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicates: pimpl: shared_ptr or unique_ptr
I have problems using std::rotate on a const_iterator over a unique_ptr middle. I have tried: std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Object> >::const_iterator middle;
Howard Hinnant explained that unique_ptr can also use a custom storage type. He mentions as an example \"shared memory\".
Would this work properly? (see example) unique_ptr<A> source() { 开发者_开发百科return unique_ptr<A>(new A);
I have some code in a header that looks like this: #include <memory> class Thing; class MyClass { std::unique_ptr< Thing > my_thing;
Somewhere in my code I have a local std::unique_ptr<T>. I need to do stuff with the object pointed at, and I use a function for that:
In this question I asked \"pimpl: shared_ptr or unique_ptr\" I\'ve been convinced that the proper usage of the pimpl idiom is to use a unique_ptr, not a shared_ptr. It should act to the user as if the
加载中,请稍侯......