When programming in C++03, we can\'t pass an unnamed temporary T() to a function void foo(T&);.The usual solution is to give the temporary a name, and then pass it like:
I have a callback implementation using rvalue references to store arguments that works fine with gcc, but fails to compile in VS 2010 on some code. A short version:
I\'m wondering the best form for my constructors. Here is some sample code: class Y { ... } class X { public:
In code below: template<class Key, class Value> class Pair { private: std::pair<Key,Value> body_;
A problem of \"value types\" with external resources (开发者_Python百科like std::vector<T> or std::string) is that copying them tends to be quite expensive, and copies are created implicitly in
In the following line of code: bootrec_reset(File(path, size, off), blksize); Calling a function with prototype:
Which is the right way to call base class move ctor? thi开发者_运维百科s (works in MSVC2010, but not in CBuilder2010):
I am reposting a comp.std.c++ Usenet discussion here because that group has become very unreliable. The last few posts I\'ve submitted there have gone into the void, and activity has all but ceased. I
What is the best way to bind an rvalue reference to either a given object or a temporary copy of it? A &&var_or_dummy = modify? static_cast<A&&>( my_A )
I am upgrading a C++ project from MSVC 2008 to 2010, and because of the new CComBSTR move constructor [CComBSTR( CComBSTR&& )], I am getting a compiler error because of an ambiguous call.
加载中,请稍侯......