There is a simple and well-known pattern to avoid the static initialization fiasco, described in section 10.13 of the C++ FAQ Lite.
I wonder if it\'s reliable to use a construction like: private static final Map<String, String> engMessages;
Is it possible to get the class type from inside the static initialization block? This is a simplified version of what I currently have::
This question made me question a practice I had been following for years. 开发者_开发知识库 For thread-safe initialization of function-local static const objects I protect the actual construction of
I\'m trying to debug a C++ program compiled with GCC that freezes at startup. GCC mutex protects function\'s static local variables, and it appears that waiting to acquire such a lock is why it freeze
I want to k开发者_运维技巧now why exactly static variables in C, C++ and Java are initialized by zero by default? And why this is not true for local variables?Why the static variables are deterministi
加载中,请稍侯......