Is there a sequence point bet开发者_开发技巧ween the two assignments in the following code: f(f(x=1,1),x=2);
I suspect the following chaining of functions would result in unspecified sequence according to the C++ standards (assume C++0x). Just want a confirmation and if anyone could provide an explanation, I
In the following type of code is there a sequence point between each variable construction, or is the result undefined?
I am using strcmp in following ways Passing char[] array names Passing pointers to string literals but, the second result in seg fault. even 开发者_如何转开发though i have confirmed that pointers po
开发者_如何学CRelated question: Any good reason why assignment operator isn't a sequence point?
The following expression is often used to demonstrate undefined unspecified behaviour: f() + g() If f() and g() both have side effects on some shared object then the behaviour is undefined unspecif
When does the post increment operator affect the increment? I have come across two opinions: 1) From http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/languages/c/programming-bbrown/c_015.htm:
When evaluation order is specified as \"left to right\" and language is a (pseudo) C-like, which are开发者_运维技巧 the sequence points in the following examples?
This code is taken from a discussion going on here. someInstance.Fun(++k).Gun(10).Sun(k).Tun(); Is this code well-defined? Is ++k in Fun() evaluated before k in Sun()?
Consider this topic a sequel of the following topic: Previous installment Undefined behavior and sequence points
加载中,请稍侯......