Is the byte alignment requirement of a given data type guaranteed to be a power of 开发者_StackOverflow2?
I\'m facing something very amazing. (Scenario: Win7 pro 64 bit, VC2008 compiling 32 bit code) Say a main program instantiate a Class that uses a std::map.
How can I explicitly disable alignment on defined variable in gcc? Take this code: typedef struct{ unsigned long long offset;
I\'m writing a decoder for a binary protocol (Javad GRIL protocol). It consists of about a hundred messages, with data in the following format:
http://www.alex-ionescu.com/?p=50. I read the above post. The author explains why Windows x64 supports only 44-bit virtual memory address with singly linked list example.
Is there guarantee, that memory for this object will be properly aligned if we create object of this type in stack?
This code seems to wo开发者_如何学JAVArk, but have I used the InterlockedIncrement function correctly? The correct memory alignment of m_count is of my primary concern. Assume we\'re on a x86-64 syste
Wo开发者_如何学运维uld somebody please tell me what an aligned pointer actually means?It means that the address being pointed at is evenly divisible by some factor.
I have been a high-level coder, and architectures are pretty new to me, so I decided to read the tutorial on Assembly here:
I\'m trying to perform a memory optimization that should be theoretically possible but that I\'m starting to doubt is within arm-elf-gcc\'s capability.Please show me that I\'m wrong.
加载中,请稍侯......