The PostgreSQL manual page on the Serializable Isolation Level states: [Like] the Repeatable Read level, applications using this level must be prepared to retry transactions due to serialization fai
I\'ve got a Seam web application working with Seam & Hibernate (JDBC to SQLServer). It\'s working well, but under heavy load (stress test with JMeter), I have some LockAcquisitionException or Opt
It is not entirely clear from MySQL documentation whethe开发者_C百科r the InnoDB engine implements true serializable isolation1 or snapshot isolation, which is often confusingly called \"serializable\
Under what scenarios we use SERIALIZABLE Isolation level? I have seen some answers on website that says, when you want transaction to be completely isolated, we usually go for this.
I\'m bit confused about relationship between a Database Open Session Connection pooling To elaborate, I\'开发者_运维百科m using JDBC with Oracle 9i DB and I\'m also using a Connection Pool to poo
Considering a forum table and many users simultaneously inserting messages into it, how safe is this transaction?
I\'m trying to utilize the SNAPSHOT transaction isolation level in Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 with the Entity Framework 4.0. However, this doesn\'t seem to be as easy as I first thought.
I have a simple table with a primary key. Most of the read operations fetch one row by the exact value of the key.
I\'ve experienced the following scenario when using NHibernate with SQL Server 2005. I have a business process which involves the following steps:
i want开发者_开发技巧 to sort my Gridview rows by a template column that is not bound to any database field. This template coulmn just has a label whose text i set in code depending on a value in a di
加载中,请稍侯......