I need a list of booleans (size anywhere from 200 to 开发者_开发知识库200k). If i use System.Collections.Generic.List<bool> I\'m going to suffer from serious boxing issues (correct me if I\'m wr
This question already has answers here: Cl开发者_StackOverflowosed 10 years ago. Possible Duplicate:
Is there a boxing operation [performance dip] when I use something like this Console.WriteLine(\"The age of the person is : \"+age.ToString());
Reading th开发者_开发技巧e book VS 2010 by John Sharp, it says that generics allows to remove the need of casting, decrease boxing of values types - decrease? I thought its removed as well as casting?
I have been reading a book and encountered a statement, that generics allow the programmer to avoid need of boxing and unboxing when using e.g. Stack.
Given these two statements... ((object)false) == ((object)false) ((object)false).Equals((object)false) The first statement returns false.
Does boxing/unboxing occur when a method accepts an out/re开发者_开发问答f parameter of a ValueType?For ref Keyword Its already mentioned on MSDN that :
I wonder if boxing is taking place in order for ToString() to be called on the integer literal (5): 5.ToS开发者_JAVA百科tring();
If I have: void Foo(dynamic X) { } And then: Foo(12); 开发者_高级运维Would 12 get boxed?I can\'t imagine it would, I\'d just like to ask the experts.Yes, it will.
MSDN says that The object data type is the type to and from which objects are boxed. 开发者_如何学GoI thought only value types are boxed? Now I am bit confused. So when I assign reference type va
加载中,请稍侯......