Is there any way to use the Interlocked.CompareExchange(); and Interlocked.Increment(); methods against values stored in a memory开发者_如何学C-mapped file?
I have read the article Synchronization and Multiprocessor Issuesand I have a question about InterlockedCompareExchange and InterlockedExchange. The question is actually about the last example in the
Based on the Microsoft documentati开发者_Python百科on InterlockedCompareExchange64 is not available as a Windows API call until Windows Vista.See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/deskto
My goal is the following: There is a certain range of integers, and I have to test every integer in that range for something random. I want to use multiple threads for this, and divide the work equal
I was looking for a thread-safe counter implementation using Interlocked that supported incrementing by arbitrary values, and found this sample straight from the Interlocked.CompareExchange documentat
Is there a neat way to do this using the Interlocked class? Or should I just use lock { }? My specific use case is that I have multiple threads that compute a long value, and compare it to a shared \
I am developing a system that uses shared memory and interlocked functions. Let\'s assume i have volatile unsigned int n, a, b. I want to do the following pseudocode atomicly:
If I were to use some kind of algorithm that uses InterlockCompareExchange operations on a variable in C++ that determines if a set of data is being written to by a particular thread (by creating my o
I want to use InterlockedExchange from the WinAPI to use a lock free synchronization of threads. At the moment I have a class like this.
I\'m writing a web link checker program and encountering behaviour with Interlocked that I can\'t explain. First, here\'s an abridged version of the code:
加载中,请稍侯......