We\'re often told we should protect encapsulation by making getter and setter methods (properties in C#) for class fields, instead of exposing the fields to the outside world.
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: What's the difference between encapsulating a private member as a property and defining a property without
Why does one want this underscore prefix in an 开发者_如何学CiOS app?Sometimes it helps to see whats happening behind the scenes to understand.Basically when you see this
It\'s allowed to do: public int Age { get; set; } but does the application create/allocate the spa开发者_如何学Pythonce for the variable? I usually do
I do agree with Mark Seeman\'s notion that Automatic Properties are somewhat evil as they break encapsulation. However I do like the concise syntax, readability and convenience they bring.
Object reference not set to an instance of an object Exception thrown..(Null referenceException wasunhandled by user code)
This question already has answers here: 开发者_JAVA百科 Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: In C++, why should new be used as little as possible?
In a discussion with a peer, it was brought up that we should consider using auto properties for all class level variables... including private ones.
I have 3 following classes: public class BaseProperty1{ public string Property1 {get; set;} } public class ChildProperty1 : BaseProperty1 {
I am working on an ASP.NET project where I use VB.NET within Visual Studio 2010. Some of the other developers on the project are using Visual Studio 2008. We all check our code into single SVN reposit
加载中,请稍侯......