Is there any downside to letting C# create the private backing fields that are generated by using the automatic property crea开发者_开发知识库tion (ie {get; set})?
I have a property: public Dictionary<string, string> MyProp { get; se开发者_JAVA百科t; } When I invoke that property to add an item, I get a NullReferenceException.
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years a开发者_如何学Gogo. Possible Duplicate: C#: Can I remove “{ get; set; }”?
Is there any way to put contracts on automatically implemented properties in .NET? (And how if the answe开发者_Go百科r is \'Yes\')?
Is is possible to auto increment an alphanumeric number with php so it looks like开发者_Python百科:
This might sound naive, but... class Widget { publ开发者_Python百科ic int Foo { get; set; } } That\'s cool, and saves some boilerplate against using a backing field, but at that point, isn\'t it eq
I am wondering about the fo开发者_Python百科llowing C#-code: struct Structure { public Structure(int a, int b)
let\'s suggest I got an interface and inherit class from it, internal interface IPersonInfo { String FirstName { get; set; }
In Visual Studio 2010, for VB.NET, the \"Prop开发者_如何学Certy\" + Tab + Tab inserts a full property implementation. Is there another snippet for inserting an autoproperty?Just put this in a file cal
Simple question I imagine, but what is the difference between 开发者_JAVA技巧these lines of code:
加载中,请稍侯......