I have a huge project written in C++. It\'s all split into multiple static libraries that are eventually linked into one final shared library which has to export only a few simple functions.
I\'m trying to execute a very simple buffer overflow attack. I\'m pretty much a newbie to this. So, if this question is stupid, please excuse me :-)
Kcachegrind will use the default one objdump by default (to get asm code from ELF). Is it pos开发者_JS百科sible to force Kcachegrind to use different objdump, e.g. /home/os_gx/local/bin/arm-linux/obj
I \"objdump -d\" an executable, e.g, /bin/ls, and I found there\'s not any main function in 开发者_Go百科the assembly code. Why?You\'d probably find a \"main()\" in most executables that haven\'t been
This is close to Using GCC to produce readable assembly?, but my context here is avr-gcc (and correspondingly, avr-objdump) for Atmel (though, I guess it would apply across the GCC board).
This question already has answers here: meaning of objdump -d output assembly (2 answers) Closed 1 year ago.
I use shared_ptr for an abstract class ABC. ABCImpl class is the implementation of ABC. abc_ptr is a shared_ptr< ABC> points to an ABCImpl objects. In caller function, abc_ptr will call one of the
I\'m learning currently x86 assembly and trying some reverse engineering on a regular x86 elf executable. Now the开发者_StackOverflow社区re are multiple sections like init main etc.
I\'m finding it really annoying to have to disassemble large swathes of library code just to get enough context to see what is causing a crash. Is there any way that I can just hand objdump an address
How to compile library with source code ? I am developing the native library with android ndk. Sometimes I got the crash dump messages from logcat.
加载中,请稍侯......