Im trying to compile a binary of an open-source project so that our users do not have to compile it themselves.
Suppose we have the class X in version 1 of the assembly A.dll: class X { SomeType Property { set; get; }
I am currently writing a library and am considering moving from GCC 4.1.2 to 4.5.2 (latest release) of GCC. If I compile my code into a static library can I assume compiler compatibility (on the same
Backward binary compatibility (or downward compatibility) - an ability of clients built with an old version of library API to run on a new one (wiki).
Are the three main compiler flavors supported by Xcode (gcc 4.0,开发者_开发知识库 4.2, and llvm) binary-compatible with one another? What kind of gotchas and corner cases should I be aware of when bri
\"API design is like sex: make one mistake and support it for the rest of your life\" (Josh Bloch on twitter)
I\'m trying to evolve an API. As part of this evolution I need to change the return type of a method to a subclass (specialize) in order for advanced clients to be able to access the new functionality
If there are two source files a.c and b.c: a.c includes the glib.h of glib-2.6.6 and b.c includes glib.h of glib-2.12
I have a class with number of private data members (some of them static), accessed by virtual and non-virtual member functions. There\'s no inline functions and no friend classes.
In the day job, I work on a VB6 (I know, but don\'t mock the afflicted...) application that uses a number of libraries we have written (also in the ever illu开发者_如何学JAVAstrious VB6). One of these
加载中,请稍侯......