I\'m curious if the default constructor and destructor that the compiler generates are inline or not, because I can justify it either way. On the one hand, you want the default constructor/destructor
What changes or code evolution break backward compatibility (mainly binary compatibility)?Is it fully specified anywhere?
I am designing an API that has to be binary-compatible between at least mingw and msvc++. So far I have restricted myself to using function which take and return primitive data types or pointers to PO
I am working on a library that allows its users (other libraries residing in the same process) to exchange data buffers and streams. The library has to be usable from both MSVC and mingw code (more co
Task: I am designing a library which will be used by developers. Objective: I need to make sure that changes in future versions will not impact existing developers.
A library provides a class with virtual functions. Can this class be extended with new virtual functions without recompiling binaries dynamically linked to the library?
I don\'t mean \"portable\" in a way that you can re-compile the source code under Linux or whatever, but rather a Windows-only application that does not require installation, so you just put the .exe
开发者_如何学JAVAJust like the title says, If I change the target cpu of a vb.net assembly, will it break binary compatibility?\"Binary compatibility\" was a VB6 term, it was relevant to generating a
I originally designed a win32 application on win7 32bits, with VC9.0. I recently upgraded to win7 64 bits, and tried to build+execute the previous application.
if i have code compiled under Solaris 8 and 10 and now have a vendor that wants to use my bin/exe under Linux. Could there be compatibility开发者_C百科 issues?
加载中,请稍侯......