I just encounter a real problem about changed API. And i want to know more about this topic. Using the following example as a demo.
Does the ABI of the view of a class remain stable even if other changes, involving virtuals, are made in the derived class?
I have some experience writing C libraries but I\'ve never read any formal documents describing good practices while writing such libraries. My question pertains around mainly 2 topics:
I need to verify something for which I have doubts. If a shared library ( .dll) is written in C, with the C99 standard and compiled under a compiler. Say MinGw. Then in my experience it is binary comp
Can I change a pure-virtual function (in a base class) to become non-pure开发者_如何学C without running into any binary compatibility issues? (Linux, GCC 4.1)
Is it possible using j2me polish to have only one jar file that run a开发者_JAVA百科cross multiple handset ?
At first some introductions: I am currently working on a C++ compatibility thing which means being able to run projects with different compiler options with each other. Therefore I test wi开发者_如何学
I\'m currently developing a C++ library for Windows which will be distributed as a DLL. My goal is to maximize binary interoperability; more precisely, the functions in my DLL must be usable from code
Consider the following C++ code: struct X { int a; int b; }; X foobar() { X x = { 1, 2 }; return x; } Now assume this code is put in a shared library, which is used by third-party applications.
Is there any possible way to run binary compiled on another Linux? I know that of course the easiest is to rebuild that on another machine but lets assume that the only thing we can get is a binary fi
加载中,请稍侯......