w^R is the reverse of w and w is {0, 1}* . So the TM needs to decide a word followed by the reverse of this word followed by the word.
I am now taking a course on Theory of Computation. I can und开发者_开发技巧erstand the concepts well. I can able to solve the problems. And, when I asked my instructor about the real world application
My copy of The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms has arrived today.In the first chapter, the author introduced Turing Machines. I have two other algorithms textbooks, Introduction to Algori开
Does anyone have a set of cellular automat开发者_如何学编程a rules for a brainfuck interpreter?I assume it would it be similar to implementations of a universal turing machine.Those exist on wolfram s
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be开发者_如何学编程 reasonably answered in its current for
Is the following language L undecidable? L = {M | M is a Turing machine description and there exists an input x of length k such that M halts after at most k steps}
If we were to interpret the Starbuck\'s mini-language menu system as some sort of grammar or state machine, woul开发者_运维百科d that grammar be Turing complete? A description of the Starbuck\'s order
If I have a Context-Free Grammar G such that the language of G is nil, is G decidable? I know the answer is yes, but I am having trouble proving this. My first thought is to say there is only one sta
Please give me some idea as to how to go about this Draw a Turing machine (using 开发者_JAVA百科Sipser notation) having at least 4 nontrivial (i.e., nonrejecting) states and at least six nontrivial (
While reading the reviews for Stephen Wolfram\'s \"A New Kind of Science\" on Amazon, I came across the following statement:
加载中,请稍侯......