I have to determine whether a language (for example L={a^n b^m c^s | 0<=n<=m<=s}) is regular, context-free, recursive, recursively enumerable or none of them.
Regular expressions are often pointed to as the classical example of a language that is not Turning complete. For example \"regular expressions\" is given in as the answer to this SO question looking
I found a Wikipedia article of a list of Turing machine equivalents. However, it doesn\'t tell a method of how to determine whether a given machine is Turing machine equivalent.
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clari
开发者_如何学CThis problem is asked in NET exam. can you please tell me how to solve this problem. Problem is accept two string with same length.
I was just looking at the turing machine simulator code and came across the following statements \"The tape maps time and position to symbols. To calculate the symbol, we have to look at t开发者_Stac
Please tell what is termin \"full fledged KI\"? As i understand it is part of 开发者_开发知识库data mining for text analyzing. Am i right? Some interesting and useful links will be fine!
Turing machines can consider complexity in both space (memory space on tapes) and time. There are classes such as PSPACE and EXPSPACE.
Do you know any programming language that implements abstract machines like Turing machines and Finite State Automatons? 开发者_运维知识库
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
加载中,请稍侯......