I have a binary search tree that I want to implement with different types.The binary search tree is templated开发者_JAVA技巧 and is determined using the following statement:
I don\'t understand why the declaration below is accepted: typedef void(*_tStandardDeclaration)(LPVOID);
The old familiar one: typedef int cute_int; //cute : common and familiar syntax. This syntax is perfect. No problem.
In my application I am using Box2D and Spidermonkey. Both libraries are defining the type uint32, which obviously gives me a compiler-error when using both in the same compilation unit.
I have a Visual Studio 2008 C++ application where a base class A_Base needs to instantiate a data member whose type is defined by a parent class. For example:
My application has a defined structure: typedef struct zsSysVersionMsg_tag { WORD cmd; BYTE len; } zsSysVersionMsg_t;
I\'ve been reading around SO and have come across the following questions which touch on why typedefing pointer types is bad.
I have a class called Edge and a class called Vertex in my Edge class there is a reference to a Vertex called target. in Vertex I send in an Edge and try to change the target through the Edge but am
I was hoping someone could help me understand the syntax of blocks when used as members of a c开发者_开发百科lass. I have some code that\'s actually working just fine:
I\'m learning how to dynamically load 开发者_JAVA百科DLL\'s but what I don\'t understand is this line
加载中,请稍侯......