I have always been a bit stumped when I read other peoples\' code which had typedefs for pointers to functions with arguments. I recall that it took me a while to get around to such a definition while
typedef set<int, less<int> > SetInt; 开发者_如何转开发 Please explain what this code does.This means that whenever you create a SetInt, you are actually creating an object of set<int,
Is there a way to create a new type that is like one of the basic types (eg char), and can be implcitly converted between, but will resolve diffrently in templates, such that for example, the followin
I\'m having some trouble with some struct typedef declarations in a header file not seeming to go through to my implementation file.
I have a class that looks like this: @interface Properties : NSObject { @private NSNumber* prop1; NSNumberBool* prop2;
加载中,请稍侯......