A while back I was thinking about how to implement various synchronization primitives in terms of one another.For example, in pthrea开发者_开发知识库ds you get mutexes and condition variables, and fro
I am using a mutex for the critical section. I have a design constraint that, 1) If 2 reads occur in 2 different thread, then critical section should be available for both.
I wrote a multithreading application for parsing logfiles. It\'s based on the mutex buffer example from http://drdobbs.com/cpp/184401518?pgno=5.
I\'m trying to implement a binary tree supporting concurrent insertions (which could occur even between nodes), but without having to allocate a global lock or a separate mutex or mutexes for each nod
I have about 50 web-sites, load-balanced across 5 web-servers. They all use Enterprise Library Caching, and access the same Caching database. The items in the Caching database are refreshed every few
We have a thread in which, when we externally call Thread.Abort(), a ThreadAbortException is caught because we have some cleanup to do. In particular, a Mutex is re开发者_开发问答quested. This crashes
OS: WindowsLanguage: C/C++ The design demands to use a mutex variable across process and its sub processes.
so let\'s say that I have a static variable, which is an array of size 5. And let\'s say I have two threads, T1 and T2, they both are trying to change the element at index 0 of that array. And 开发者_
I just installed facebook connect for my site, but without having edited something on the files that cast the error I get this:
After calling unlock() on a boost::recursive_mutex::scoped_lock, will the lock object reference the mutex somehow in 开发者_StackOverflowits destructor?
加载中,请稍侯......