Is a mutex lock needed around a section of code that involves pointer indirection (where the pointer points to data that is part of a critical section)? An example code:
I have a test program that I wrote to try and debug a GMutex issue that I am having and I cannot seem to figure it out.I am using the class below to lock and unlock a mutex within a scoped context.Thi
I am getting a database table value in wxListCtrl, (data can be large so I am using wxThread) Child thread send row to Main thread and main thread fill it in wxListCtrl,
what is the fact that one should use distributed mutex algorithm (e.g. Maekawa\'s algorithm) over simple mutex. W开发者_JS百科hat is a situation that simple mutex locking would lack to provide mutual
I\'m using a simple queue implementation and I\'m trying to make a simple program that has two threads: first one queue events on the queue and the second one processes them. I\'m using mutexes to avo
I\'m working on an implementation of the \"Fair Barbershop\" problem in Ruby. This is for a class assignment, but I\'m not looking for any handouts.I\'ve been searching like crazy, but I cannot seem t
...SO I fixed it a bit, but it says now ... Test of acceleration: Program acrossed time limit... Duration: 5 sec !(limit 8 sec)!...
Do I need to use Mutex with object instances that may be concurrently updating a different object instance?
Already posted a doubt about the same issue, but i think the answers started to go in other direction, so i will try to focus my questions :P
I am trying to implement a crude thread interrupt. The \'interruptRequested\' variable is being checked pretty often. In Operating Systems class we learned about starvation -- Is that possible here o
加载中,请稍侯......