Here is the snippet: prog1: HANDLE hM; hM = CreateMutexA(NULL,TRUE, \"abc\"); // I have to use TRUE otherwise WaitForSingleObject fails.. by design it wants to take ownership and w//o TRUE there is n
So far I have this code: ****SimpleForm.h**** class TForm1 : public TForm { __published:// IDE-managed Components
So I had some shared_mutex and done this: boost::upgrade_lock<boost::shared_mutex> lock(f->mutex);开发者_C百科
I create threads of class A and each sends a serialized object to a Server using ObjectOutputStream. The Server creates new Threads B for each socket connection (whenever a new A client connects)
I am quite new for pa开发者_JAVA技巧rallel programming. Right now I have a problem and try to TBB solve it.
From what I have learned about Mutexes - they generally provide a locking capabili开发者_JS百科ty on a shared resources. So if a new thread wants to access this locked shared resource - it either quit
Simple edition: In a C++ program I\'m using two different threads to work with some integer variable. but I\'m sure one is always writing some value into it and the other one is only reading That. do
This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time,or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applic
Recently, I h开发者_Python百科ave been working with Ruby\'s threads, and have uncovered a slightly unexpected behaviour.In a critical section, calling raise causes the mutex to release.I could expect
Are there ways to implement named process internal mutexes using C/C++ (in Unix/开发者_Go百科Linux)?
加载中,请稍侯......