In my application ,I am allocating memory to store \"volume data\" which read from stack of bitmap images.
The C standard guarantees that an int is able to stor开发者_开发知识库e every possible array size. At least, that\'s what I understand from reading §6.5.2.1, subsection 1 (Array subscripting constrai
I am using the Oracle API to access a database and this API has a function readBuffer(char * buffer, unsigned int size); to which I cannot make any changes.
When I want to use size_t in C++, should I include <stddef.h>开发者_开发问答; or <cstddef>? I have heard several people saying that <cstddef> was a bad idea, and it should be deprecat
I\'ve been trying to make a for loop that will iterate based off of the length of a network packet. In the API there exists a variable (size_t) by event.packet->dataLength. I want to iterate from 0 to
This question already has answers here: Closed 12 years ago. Possible Duplicate: unsigned int vs. size_t
I\'m writing some code examples from \"How to Think Like a Computer Scientist in C++\", and this one is about handling playing-card type objects and decks.I\'m facing this situation:
Along the same lines as to what was described in conversion to ‘size_t’ from ‘int’ may change the sign of the result - GCC , C, I would instead like to insure that the warning I receive under GCC
size_t size = sizeof(int); printf(\"%d\\n\", size); int i; for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { printf(\"%d \", i);
i wanted to declare a very large array. i found that the max size of an array is size_t, which is def开发者_开发技巧ined as UINT_MAX
加载中,请稍侯......