I recently updated an application from VS2003 to VS2008 and I knew I would be dealing with a host of \"Cross-thread operation not valid: Control \'myControl\' accessed from a thread other than the thr
The usual pattern for a singleton class is something like sta开发者_开发技巧tic Foo &getInst()
I\'ve got a class wit开发者_如何学JAVAh several properties. On every value update, a Store method is called which stores all fields (in a file).
Hello I am writing some data structures in C, and I\'ve realized that their associated functions aren\'t thread safe. The i am writing code uses only standard C, and I want to achieve some sort of \'s
Why is locking a type considered very bad? For example, lock(typeof(DateTime)) I understand tha开发者_JAVA百科t static methods of any class in .net is considered thread safe, and that instance members
There are lots written about the ReaderWriterLockSlim class which allows multiple read and a开发者_如何转开发 single write. All of these (at least that I had found) tell how to use it without much exp
I know, it has been made quite clear in a couple of questions/answers before, that volatile is related to the visible state of the c++ memory model and not to multithreading.
This question already has answers here: Can num++ be atomic for 'int num'? (13 answers) Closed 2 years ago.
The Application static members are supposed to be thread safe: The public s开发者_高级运维tatic (Shared in Visual
I\'ve been reading the answer to a similar question, but I\'m still a little confused... Abel had a great answer, but this is the part that I\'m unsure about: