I made the following sample program to play with boost threading: #pragma once #include \"boost\\thread\\mutex.hpp\"
This is how i call that error given function var开发者_JAVA技巧 CrawlPage = Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
I\'m trying to find the fastest possible and lock free solution for one producer-many consumers scenario. I assume that when dealing with only one producer and values can be lost in between we need to
I am thinking to use HttpContext.Current.Cache which ha开发者_Go百科s application level scope. I know that Cache object is thread safe but the thing that i don\'t understand is cached objects are not
I have an older form that I really don\'t want to rewrite at this point, so what I\'m doing is loading the form and then adding it to a panel in the new UI form. This is working fine, but it\'s slow.
Is it safe to write code in this way? var form = new Form(); Action callback = () => { // do something 1
NumberFormat JavaDoc says: Number formats are generally not synchronized. It is recommended to create separate format instances for each thread.
My thread should return an array-list and put it into files. My problem is that it just stops(at least that\'s how I see it).
I\'m beginning to think the answer to my question is \'No\', but I\'m still confused and uncertain about this. So please confirm. I\'ve already learned the need to be careful when using Core Data with
This is good example of stopping thread. How to stop a java thread gracefully? But when I try to check this example I received infinite loop.
加载中,请稍侯......