I\'m currently developing a C-module for a Java-application that needs some performance improvements (see Improving performance of network coding-encoding for a background). I\'ve tried to optimize th
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: How to decode viewstate
Word on the street is that for loops in scala are slower than while loops. Slow: for (i <- 0 until 10000) {
I have: .sketch_img_thumb_box .title{ opacity: 0.1; } .sketch_img_thumb_box:hover .title{ opacity: 1; } .sketch_img_thumb_box .artist{
While looking at some questions on optimization, this accep开发者_StackOverflowted answer for the question on coding practices for most effective use of the optimizer piqued my curiosity.The assertion
I need to fill a database with millions of records, and my current routine for that looks something like:
I have defined a class1 which is inherited from base 1. I have also defined another class2 which contains simila members as in class1 but this class inherited from base2.
I have to do the following: Public Sub OnMouseMove If mouseDownButNotYetMoved Then myObjectsStateArchive.SaveObjectsState(myCurrentObjectsState.Clone())
I am optimizing some hotspots in my application and compilation is done using gcc-arm. Now, is there any chance that the following statements result in different assembler code:
I have to find a diagonal difference in a matrix represented as 2d array and the function prototype is
加载中,请稍侯......