When overloading operators开发者_C百科, is it necessary to overload >= <= and !=? It seems like it would be smart for c++ to call !operator= for !=, !> for operator<= and !< for operator>=.
I have the following problem with bool operator() for derived class Base class class Point { double x, y;
To test and display the result of some functions of my library, I am creating a set of handy functions.
I am having problems getting the desired behavior out of these few classes and interfaces. Here is my problem,
Problem with operator[] in c++, i have some class: 197 class Permutation{ 198private: 199unsigned int* array;
I was reading a Business Primitives by CodeBetter.com and was toying around with the idea. Taking his example of Money, how would one implement this in a way that it can be used similarily as regular
I\'m implementing vector class and I need to get an opposite of some vector. Is it possible to define this method using operator overloading?
Well, I\'m new to operator overloading, and I found this problem. Instead of documenting myself, I prefer to ask you :D
I\'ve this program #include <iostream> #include <sstream> #include <iterator> #include <vector>
Suppose i have declared subscript operators in a class char& operator[] (int index); const char operator[](int index) const;
加载中,请稍侯......