开发者

How can I improve my Trie implementation in terms of initialization?

I'm trying to read in from a huge list of words and store them in a way that allows me to make quick retrievals later on. I first thought of using a trie and I'll admit my implementation is naive, it's basically nest开发者_C百科ed hash tables with each key being a different letter. Right now it takes forever to insert a word into the trie (running this program takes 20+ seconds), and I was wondering if anyone had any ideas as to what I could do to improve my insertion? This isn't for homework.

import string
import time

class Trie:

    def __init__(self):
        self.root = TrieNode()

    def insert_word(self, word):
        current_node = self.root
        for letter in word:
            trie_node = current_node.get_node(letter)
            current_node = trie_node

class TrieNode:

    def __init__(self):
        self.data = {}

    def get_node(self, letter):
        if letter in self.data:
            return self.data[letter]
        else:
            new_trie_node = TrieNode()
            self.data[letter] = new_trie_node
            return new_trie_node

def main():
    start_time = time.time()
    trie = Trie()

    with open('/usr/share/dict/words', 'r') as dictionary:
        word_list = dictionary.read()
    word_list = word_list.split("\n")

    for word in word_list:
        trie.insert_word(word.lower())

    print time.time() - start_time, "seconds"


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()


It is utterly pointless working on speeding up your trie initialisation before you have considered whether your search facility is working or not.

In the code that @unutbu referred to, why do you imagine it is mucking about with {'end':False} and pt['end']=True ?

Here is some test data for you:

words_to_insert = ['foo', 'foobar']
queries_expecting_true = words_to_insert
queries_expecting_false = "fo foe foob food foobare".split()

And here's another thought: You give no indication that you want anything more than the ability to determine whether a query word is present or not. If that is correct, you should consider benchmarking your DIY trie against a built-in set. Criteria: load speed (consider doing this from a pickle), query speed, and memory usage.

If you do want more retrieved than a bool, then substitute dict for set and re-read this answer.

If you do want to search for words in an input string, then you could consider the code referenced by @unutbu, with bugs fixed and some speedups in the find function (evaluate len(input) only once, use xrange instead of range (Python 2.x)) and the unnecessary TERMINAL: False entries removed:

TERMINAL = None # Marks the end of a word

def build(words, trie=None): # bugs fixed
    if trie is None:
        trie = {}
    for word in words:
        if not word: continue # bug fixed
        pt = trie # bug fixed
        for ch in word:
            pt = pt.setdefault(ch, {})
        pt[TERMINAL] = True
    return trie

def find(input, trie):
    len_input = len(input)
    results = []
    for i in xrange(len_input):
        pt = trie
        for j in xrange(i, len_input + 1):
            if TERMINAL in pt:
                results.append(input[i:j])
            if j >= len_input or input[j] not in pt:
                break
            pt = pt[input[j]]
    return results    

or you could look at Danny Yoo's fast implementation of the Aho-Corasick algorithm.


There is an alternate implementation of Trie here.

Compare Trie.insert_word to build:

def build(words,trie={'end':False}):
    '''
    build builds a trie in O(M*L) time, where
        M = len(words)
        L = max(map(len,words))
    '''
    for word in words:
        pt=trie
        for letter in word:
            pt=pt.setdefault(letter, {'end':False})
        pt['end']=True
    return trie

With Trie, for each letter in word, insert_word calls current_node.get_node(letter). This method has an if and else block, and must instantiate a new TrieNode whenever the else block is reached, and a new key-value pair is then inserted into the self.data dict.

With build, the trie itself is just a dict. For each letter in word, there is simply one call to pt.setdefault(...). dict methods are implemented in C and are faster than implementing similar code in Python.

timeit shows about a 2x speed difference (in favor of build):

def alt_main():
    with open('/usr/share/dict/words', 'r') as dictionary:
        word_list = dictionary.read()
    word_list = word_list.split("\n")
    return build(word_list)


% python -mtimeit -s'import test' 'test.main()'
10 loops, best of 3: 1.16 sec per loop

% python -mtimeit -s'import test' 'test.alt_main()'
10 loops, best of 3: 571 msec per loop
0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜