In order to disable copying of my class I\'m suppose to declare as private but not define operator=(const MyClass&) and MyClass(const MyClass&) - do I have to also disable move ctor for this c
A problem of \"value types\" with external resources (开发者_Python百科like std::vector<T> or std::string) is that copying them tends to be quite expensive, and copies are created implicitly in
I have two containers, let\'s say they\'re defined like this: std::vector<std::unique_ptr<int>> a;
I have a container std::vector and I would like to efficiently split it into sub-ranges with x items in each. The original container is not needed so the items should be moved and not copied into the
So I have been reading about std::move, std::forward, rvalues, lvalues ad so on in SO and other places. But I find that I can\'t grasp it. Even though I sometimes get into fixes, I think I understand
Which is the right way to call base class move ctor? thi开发者_运维百科s (works in MSVC2010, but not in CBuilder2010):
I think I do understand \"the basic IDEA\" of move semantics, but now when I\'m on the stage of implementing my own map I stopped 开发者_运维问答and started to think about it when I was going to write
I would like to return a noncopyable object of type Foo from a function. This is basically a helper object which the caller will use to perform a set of actions, with a destructor to perform some clea
What is it? Wh开发者_JAVA技巧at does it do? When should it be used? Good links are appreciated.1. "What is it?"
As I\'ve asked in Move constructor/operator= and after a while I\'ve agreed and accepted right answer to that question I was just thinking, if would it be useful to have something like \"moving destru