I just tried the following code snippet for shellcode testing purposes:- #include<iostream> using namespace std;
Basic开发者_Python百科ally the function I am exploiting is this: int getbufn() { char buf[512]; Gets(buf);
Does anyone know of any online source that provides instruction alternatives to a NOP opcode ? Like \'xchg ax, ax\' and the likes. I\'m pretty sure that there is also a tool for it开发者_StackOverflo
I want to comprehend the exact difference between these two types of attack. From what I have read: Buffer Overflow: It overwrites the ret address on the stack to point to another section of the code
I am trying to learn to exploit simple bufferover flow technique on Backtrack Linux. Here is my C program
I am trying to convert an assembly prog开发者_StackOverflowram I wrote into NULL-free shellcode. However, I am unsure how to go about this for certain instructions.
I\'ve been working on some exploit development recently to get ready for a training course, and I\'ve run into a problem with a tutorial. I\'ve been following along with all the tutorials I can find,
if kernel32.dll is guaranteed to loaded into a process virtual memory,why couldn\'t i call function such as Sleep without including windows.h?
char shellcode[] =\"\\xeb\\x2a\\x5e\\x89\\x76\\x08\\xc6\\x46\\x07\\x00\\xc7\\x46\\x0c\\x00\\x00\\x00\"\"\\x00\\xb8\\x0b\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x89\\xf3\\x8d\\x4e\\x08\\x8d\\x56\\x0c\\xcd\\x80\"\"\\xb8\\x01\\
When I use shellcode such as the ones provided here* as payload to some vu开发者_StackOverflow社区lnerable program, how is the shell executed as root? I am asking about how the privileges are elevated
加载中,请稍侯......