Say I want to cast A* to char* and vice-versa, we have two choices (I mean, many of us think we\'ve two choices, because both seems to work! Hence the confusion!):
I have mixed feelings about static_cast, as it is the safest C++ cast available, but allows both safe and unsafe conversions at the same time, so you have to know the context to say if it is actually
I have a program in which I need to use the Format(); function to combine a string literal and a int into a CString variable. I have tried several different ways of doing this, the code for them is he
I have a small SDI application to which I am trying to add tracking of menu usage, ie. how many times certain menu items are selected by the user.
Edit - Put the question into context a bit more. Given: struct Base { ... }; struct Derived : public Base { ...
I have four classes: class A {}; class B : virtual public A {}; class C : vi开发者_如何学JAVArtual public A {};
I need to write code for a callback function (it will be called from within ATL, but that\'s not really important):
I was answering a question a few minutes ago and it raised to me another one: In one of my projects, I do some network message parsing. The messages are in the form of:
AFAIK, for pointers/references static_cast, if a class definition i开发者_如何转开发s not visible to compiler at this point, then static_cast will be behave like reinterpret_cast.