I started using ZeroMQ this week, and when using the Request-Response pattern I am not sure how to have a worker safely \"hang up\" and close his socket without possibly dropping a message and causing
I\'m trying to compile ZeroMQ C binding in order to be able to use it on iPhone, here is my configure options:
Trying to follow the directions from: http://github.com/zeromq/jzmq I installed pkg-config using Homebrew and then I run the following commands:
I\'ve grown to like erlang, and it\'s a great (cough) architectural fit to my problem. Meanwhile I still like to imagine that I can kludge erlang processes & asynchronous message passing in python
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
I\'ve tied myself in knots, being new to both STOMP and 0MQ, but in a nutshell, I want to facilitate client to client communication in the browser with interaction from a PHP MOM or a number of PHP MO
I\'m interested in: Performance Latency Throughput Resource usage (CPU, memory, ...) High availability No single point of failure
I\'ve got client and server applications using zmq in the ZMQ_REQ context. What I\'m experiencing is that when the server component goes 开发者_运维百科down or is unavailable, the client will wait unt
I am having a hard time understanding the ZeroMQ messaging system, so before I dive in, I wanted to see if anyone knew if what I want to do is even possible.
[1] I was reading through the AMQP standard, and it seems that there is a clear separation between the exchange, queue and binding component. However, looking at the zeromq docs, it doesn\'t seem as i
加载中,请稍侯......