I have implemented a small lisp interpretor (sapid lisp at google code) in python and sapid lisp itself. Perhaps its main characteristic is to implement tail and mutual recursion optimization through
Code to determine the lat element of a list, using pattern matching: @tailrec def last_rec[A](list : List[A]) : A = {
I coded 3 factorial algorithms: I expect to fail by stack overflow. No problem. I try a tail recursive call, and convert the previous algorithm from r开发者_开发技巧ecursive to iterative. It doesn\'
Reading a blog entry by Eric Lippert, I came across this snippet: ...you\'re going to either loop forever (if you\'re on an architecture
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: Why doesn't .net/C# eliminate tail recursion?
Basically I am creating a base class that will be used for classes stored as a linked list, which are traversed and deleted as dictated by a virtual update() function which returns a bool.
I\'ve discovered (by accident) that the last CLR does the tail call optimization. I have tested it with a piece of code, but frankly it doesn\'t behave the way I expected. I thought the tail call opti
Disclosure: this came up in开发者_如何学JAVA FsCheck, an F# random testing framework I maintain. I have a solution, but I do not like it. Moreover, I do not understand the problem - it was merely circ
I\'ve written a small Scheme interpreter in an unholy mix of C/C++, but I have yet to implement proper tail calls.
Below is a snippet that开发者_如何学Go gets programmatically generated for a toy programming language, actual code is different but following shows what it does when executed,
加载中,请稍侯......