Consider the following code: struct Base {}; struct Derived : public virtual Base {}; void f() { Base* b = new Derived;
I understand that virtual inheritance of a base class creates a common shared base class among multiple derived classes, thus addressing the DDD problem. If I have only one derived class for my base c
How the compilers implement the virtual i开发者_Python百科nheritance? In the following code: class A {
consider the following : #include <iostream> #include <string> using namespace std; class A {
What are the C++98/C++03 standards\' and the C++0x future standard\'s exact rules for dominance in virtual inheritance?
Given the following code (without virtual inheritance) : class A { public: virtual void f() = 0; }; class B : public A
I have some troubles with the application of polymorphism in this example. This question is similar to my last question
I\'m trying to implement a rather large object that implements many interfaces. Some of these interfaces are pure virtual. I may have a problem in diamond inheritance. Visual Studio is reporting a war
There is one little related question. But the topic is entirely different. Now, one co开发者_如何学JAVAncept is about the function resolution and another is about class resolution ? I am wondering th
Recently ran across a C++ linker error that was new to me. libfoo.so: undefined reference to `VTT for Foo\'
加载中,请稍侯......