I have been reading and learning about NoSQL and MongoDB, CouchDB, etc, for the last two days, but I still can\'t tell if this is the right kind of storage for me.
Consider an unversioned bucket with only eventual consistency. Suppose I just uploaded an object, and now I delete it. The delete request goes to a server to which the object has not yet propagated.
When using distributed and scalable architecture, eventual consistency is often a requirement. Graphically, how to deal with this eventual consistency?
Is it possible to create/store user accounts in a data store that exhibits eventual consistency? It seems impossible to manage account creation without a heap of ar开发者_如何学编程chitectural comple
Read-your-own-writes consistency is great improvement from the so called eventual consistency: if I change my profile picture I don\'t care if others see the change a minute later, but it looks weird
I\'m dev开发者_如何学Goeloping a system against Amazon\'s S3. I\'m doing it in C# using S3\'s .NET SDK.
The idea of asynchronous write, or write-behind, is that clients submit a request for a write operation, a开发者_开发百科nd then go their merry way without waiting for the write operation to conclude.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
When there is high concurrency up开发者_StackOverflowdates in index table how hbase ensure index consistency with data? that scan on index table won\'t see obsolete data when query primary table.
Scenario is a grid with a list of contacts.User clicks on \'send email\' from grid, sends an email.We drop a message in a queue to update some aggregates (which are also displayed on the list).