Is code that uses the static Object.Equ开发者_开发问答als to check for null more robust than code that uses the == operator or regular Object.Equals? Aren\'t the latter two vulnerable to being overrid
I need to serialize some data in a binary format for efficiency (datalog where 10-100MB files are typical), and I\'m working out the formatting details. I\'m wondering if realistically I need to worry
What\'s the best way of writi开发者_StackOverflow社区ng robust code so that a variable can be checked for null and blank.
When I open a file, I want to know if it is being used by another process so I can perform special handling; any other IOException I will bubble up. An IOException\'s Message property contains \"The p
I am using GridView in asp .net and editing data with edit command field property (as we know after updating the edited row, we automatically update the database), and I want to use transactions (with
I want to write a .emacs that uses as much of the mainline emacs functionality as possible, falling back gracefully when run under previous versions. I\'ve found through trial and error some functions
Our product is a distributed system. The modules I work on are fairly new, quite rigorous, well tested. They were developed with recent best practices in mind. Other modules can be considered as legac
I hate writing code that makes my software more solid. This is something the framework should have done! So, is anybody aware of a code \"enhancing\" utility that solidifies the code?
加载中,请稍侯......