I was trying to do something like: public class MyClass <A, B, C <A, B>开发者_运维百科 > {
I am trying to make some Haskell types which are parametrized not by types but by elements of a type, specifically, integers.For instance, a (linear-algebra) vector in R^2 and a vector in R^3 are diff
You can find the following on the web: Higher kinded type == type constructor?开发者_如何学运维
I\'ve just started playing around with higher-kinded types in Scala and I\'m experiencing behavior that I do not understand.I\'m doing all of this in the REPL on Scala 2.9.0.1.
This question already has answers here: Closed 10 years ago. Possible Duplicate: Context bounds shortcut with higher kinded-types
Is it possible to use the context bounds syntax shortcut with higher kinded-types? trait One { def test[W: ClassManifest]: Unit } // first-order ok
I\'m desperately trying to solve the following: trait Access[Res[_]] { def access[C]: Res[C] } trait CList[C1, A] extends Access[CList[_, A]] // ?!
I\'ve been playing around with Scalaz to get a little bit of the haskell feeling into scala. To understand how things work in scala I started implementing various algebraic structures myself and came
Let\'s say I have this trait trait Ctx[C, V[_]] I am unable to construct any method signature that takes a Ctx of which the second type parameter is unspecified (wildcard). E.g. this:
Consider the following code: object foo { trait开发者_如何转开发 Bar[Q[_]] implicit object OptionBar extends Bar[Option]
加载中,请稍侯......