I am working on an exercise which asks me to take a base class Rodent an开发者_开发知识库d make it a pure abstract class. My understanding of a pure abstract class is that it acts as an interface and
Consider the following : class Abstract { public: virtual void f开发者_JAVA技巧unc() = 0; }; int main() {
So here is the box I am in.I want to understand why it is important to have a \"virtual destructor inside your interface class\".You will see why that stuff is in quotes if you can hang to the end...I
I am writing an application in c++. I have an interface defined with various functions: class ITest { public:
I believe the problem may stem 开发者_开发问答from using boost::shared_ptrs as key values. //header file:
I have found some code that I am working on, and wa开发者_Python百科s wondering what the best design implementation is.
I have the following: class Parent { public: virtual bool foo(vector<string> arg1, vector<string> arg2) = 0;
Can I change a pure-virtual function (in a base class) to become non-pure开发者_如何学C without running into any binary compatibility issues? (Linux, GCC 4.1)
i have a a couple c++ interfaces like this: struct IThese { virtual void doThesethings() = 0; } struct IThose : public IThese {
I was browsing through the sources of a (prefer not to name) GUI Toolkit which wrapped up the Windows API when I found the following function 开发者_如何学运维definition in the window class:
加载中,请稍侯......