Specifically is there some risk that data can be lost?I\'m looking at running an intensive transaction processing system where it is critical that nothing be lost.Are there any examples of NoSQL being
I\'ve got transactional application that works like so: try { $db->begin(); increaseNumber(); $db->commit();
a while ago I completely recoded my application so that MySQL would perform in an ACID way. At the very top level of all functions I do something like this:
I am newbie to database and SQL Server. So when i have search 开发者_如何学Pythonthings about database on internet i have found that The Database said to be good if it obey or follow the ACID (Atomic
I was talking to a guy who was using an ATM when it crashed (it was running Windows XP, apparently) and took his money.
It is not entirely clear from MySQL documentation whethe开发者_C百科r the InnoDB engine implements true serializable isolation1 or snapshot isolation, which is often confusingly called \"serializable\
Does anyon开发者_如何学运维e know why Mysql requires serializable isolation level to achieve ACID properties with XA transactions or what would be lost if you used repeatable read and XA?
Sorry for the ignorant question, but what kind of applications wouldn\'t require an ACID compliant database server?I have a SQL Server background where 开发者_如何转开发ACID has always \"been there\",
Our architecture comprises of Web Services developed on JAX-WS specification using Metro. These services are deployed on a single Glass Fish App server as separate war
I have studied a lot how durability is achieved in databases and if I understand well it works like this (simplified):
加载中,请稍侯......