I have a follow-on question to the problem that the presence of overloaded method definitions with and without parameters leads to a compilation error, which is already discussed here: Why is thi开发者
Consider the following: class A { private: A() {} public: A(int x = 0) {} }; int main() { A a(1); return 0; } I have two constructors, one is a default and the other one is converting constructor
So, here is some basic code which illustrates my question: #include <functional> int func(int x) {
I can\'t believe I\'ve never come across this before, but why am I getting a compiler error for this code?
Suppose we have the input that looks like the sequence of simple English statements, each on a separate line, like these:
Edit: Posted an answer of my own, kept the original accepted answer... got me thinking about aliases.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
I\'m having some trouble understanding how to deal with ambiguity of constructors in D. struct mydta {
I\'m confused about how context-sensitivity and ambiguity influence each other. What i think is correct is:
I\'m not too familiar with programming in C (I\'ve only done a few small projects in the language), however, my professor said something about it\'s behavior today that left me a bit confused.
加载中,请稍侯......