I got two objects from the same class and I need to compare them field by field. The problem is that they have close to hundred fields and it would be helluva work to write that by hand.
I have two custom classes, ChangeRequest and ChangeRequests, where a ChangeRequests can contain many ChangeRequest instances.
As far as I know, things such as SortedMap or SortedSet, use compareTo (rather than equals) on Comparable<?> types for checking equality (contains, containsKey).
var clicked = $(event.currentTarget || target); var clickedIsActive = clicked[0] == this.active[0]; I\'m fairly new to js, and while attempting to read through some jQuery code, I came across the开发
I\'m trying to create a new type in Clojure using deftype to implement a two dimensional (x,y) coordinate, which implements a \"Location\" protocol.
This question already has answers here: Closed 12 years ago. Possible Duplicate: Best practices regarding equals: to overload or not to overload?
I’m using Visual Studio 2010 with .NET 4 and Entity Framework 4. I’m working with POCO Classes and not the EF4 Generator. I need to override the Equals() and GetHashCode() methods, but that doesn’t
Consider the following snippet: import java.util.*; public class EqualsOverload { public static void main(String[] args) {
I\'m writing a routine to invoke methods, 开发者_JAVA百科found by a name and an array of parameter Class values
Why are the methods contains() and indexOf() in the Java collections framework defined using o.equals(e) an开发者_如何学God not e.equals(o) (where o is the argument of the methods and e is the element