Sometimes you need to define some business rules and the Specification pattern is a useful tool. For example:
I figured out how to do a predicate from a string supplied by a client based on Dynamic Linq (this is wrapped in a Specification object):
I have a repository with the following method: IEnumerable<T> FindAll<TRelated>(Specification<T> specification,
I have only seen the specification pattern used to retrieve data, but not to validate it. A colleague suggested I can use the specification pattern to “validate” an object so it does not become inva
I am trying to grasp specification pattern and i get confused a little about it. I really couldn\'t found it helpful for my specific requirements. I want to know that what is problem if i prefer exten
I\'m building a system where a user can subsribe for items and get periodically notifications for new items. Users should define what items they want by filtering on certain properties.
I am trying to implement the composite specification pattern, as per the Specifications Document by Fowler and Evans.
I have an ASP.NET MVC2 app that has heavy use of grids. I\'d like to see if there is a way to add efficient paging and filtering to the typical Specification pattern.
I\'m planning to use \"Specification pattern\" to validate my domain objects in my solution. Where is the \"correct\" place to put the \"specification\" classes in my solution? Should I create a 开发
I\'m j开发者_运维百科ust wondering if Specification pattern is pointless, given following example:
加载中,请稍侯......