I have a model code on which kcachegrind/callgrind reports strange results. It is kind of dispatcher function. The dispatcher is called from 4 places; each call says, which actual do_J function to run
I have an xdebug profile on a php script that I parsed with kcachegrind. Here is a screenshot showing that the most time spent inside any given function was spent inside <cycle 1> and the top \'
Kcachegrind will use the default one objdump by default (to get asm code from ELF). Is it pos开发者_JS百科sible to force Kcachegrind to use different objdump, e.g. /home/os_gx/local/bin/arm-linux/obj
How to view output of gprof in kcachegrind? Is here a converter from gcc\'s gmon.out in开发者_开发技巧to callgrind.out?Currently, this seems not to be supported. It is mentioned on Kcachegrind\'s whis
Profiling some C++ number crunching code with both gprof and kcachegrind gives similar results for the functions that contribute most to the execution time (50-80% depending on input) but for function
I work usually with valgrind+kcachegrind to profile C++ codes. A new code I am working with uses very long function names, so that the graphical results are a mess. I wonder how can one s开发者_JS百科
Mac environment (php v5.3.3).I need to analyze xdebug profiling logs.Reading around I understood that I should use Kcachegrind.I\'m following a DevZone tutorial Profiling PHP applications with Xdebug.
for some reason I\'m able to create the outputfile inside my /tmp directory but the files aren\'t readable neither from kcachegrind or wcachegrind (the windows version)
Currently, I can\'t g开发者_StackOverflow中文版et my kcachegrind instance to display more than 499 list items.This leaves me with an incomplete Call Graph.
I am doing first steps with KCachegrind/Cachegrind. I run Cachegrind on machine A then I moved the output files on machine B where I have KCachegrind installed.
加载中,请稍侯......